|
The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene Had a great time with a government approved broad in Geylang? Tell us all about it! No FREELANCE crap here please. Legal commercial sex only. Threads about illegal Geylang whores carry a reputation point penalty. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Oh I always there every sat always see many kids w parents
|
|
||||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Nowadays many if not all GL WLs would not allow two shots even if one can make it within the time limit. Do remember the WL only earn $72-80 out of the $150 ones paid. (However there are exceptional cases for super regulars). Perhaps you can propose to top up another $50 (min). No need to involve their OKT, just negotiate with the WL concern directly. But of course you still need to stay within the time limit. Enjoy!
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
|
||||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
At one time in the past, 54A OKTs disallowed more than 2 sessions for each visit because they feared that the punters might pyscho and/or develop deep relationship with the WLs who might eventually slacken in their performance and reluctant to work. There were potential Bao-ers who liked to book the WL for 4 or more sessions each time and eventually baoed the WLs ... Henceforth, the OKT tried to minimize this situation. But they need not worry too much now as the number of bao-ers have dwindled these days because many were being "burned" big time by some sly PRC WLs, and also WLs of baoed materials coming here to work has tapered significantly over the years.
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Guess i should pen a FR for this wonderful house, although the standards have dropped by leaps and bounds.
I went on a rampage to try the top girls in this house, in accordance with the FRs given by the dear bros here: Xiaomi Coco Emily Linglong |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Xiaomi
Looks: 7/10 Sweet and gentle GND look, with smooth snowy white complexion Figure: 7/10 A bit on the meaty side BBBJ: 7/10 Hardworking AR: 7/10 Standard FJ: 6/10 GFE: 7/10 needs warming up in the room. Otherwise, icy cold Coco Look: 8/10 prettiest of the 4 ladies Figure: 9/10 Excellent long leggy lass BBBJ: 7/10 standard AR: 7/10 standard FJ: 7/10 GFE: 6/10 cold and nonchalant, although she tried to cook up a little chat after the deed. She was available in the waiting room with Emily and i didnt bother to RTF and went for the latter instead. Emily Looks: 6.5/10 Nothing to shout about, but complexion near flawless Figure: 7/10 meaty but nice sets of boobs to fonder BBBJ: 7.5/10 needs improvement but full of passion and tongue work AR: 7.5/10 Lots of wet works FJ: 7.5/10 GFE: 8.5/10 Aims to please every second in the room LingLong Looks: 6/10 small, petite ah lian look. Not a bad looker, just not to my liking. Figure: 7/10 Very skinny 42kg frame. Boobs are Bs and considered 'large' relative to her frame. Schoolgirl feel BBBJ: 8/10 One of the better ones amongst them i tried, except Chu Chu. She makes it a point to deepthroat every 5-8 strokes, almost gagging herself. She had experience in DG's sangna before, thus explained the skill level. AR: 7/10 Great start to AR (my fav) going deep into the anus but ended off with very minimal licking of the balls. FJ: 8/10 passionate, deep smooching and like lovers fucking. Great feel. GFE:- 8.5/10 Wonderful attitude, especially with her coming of age, she is a sweet talker. |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
I gotta say, the standard of the ladies in 1654A has dropped drastically.
It is a sad truth, even Garrick admitted its rather difficult to engage the hotter ones from China. In Hongkong, per session will cost SGD266 compared to $150 in GL here, resulting in the 'top talents' shunning the singapore market. Gone are the days where I would fork out 3-4 sessions for a afternoon of wild sex with the recent batch of hot big-boobie Yiyi or treat myself to a special double-fly with the deadly combo Xiaoxue+$$$$$$$$. Going back further, the old-birds should recall the sweeties Xiaoman, Lulu, Meihui, Ella... we were so spoiled for choices. |
|
||||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
I believe u have not tried or seen the pioneer batch of GL PRC WLs many years ago ... If you have seen the top pioneer PRC WLs, you would agree with me that Meihui, Xiaoman or Lulu is nothing compared to these top few pioneer batch GL PRC WLs ...
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ... My Personal FR Thread: ( Click to show/hide )
Last edited by max_priest; 03-09-2015 at 09:16 PM. |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Quote:
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
is An An working today? any regulars knw?
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Sorry Bros.. Can i confirm 1654a is Lorong 16 house 54a? What's the damage ? Wanna try Linglong due to FR review and her deeptthroat. I'm a sucker for that.
What's the damage ? |
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Is a new girl named 乐乐 in 1654A? Anyone has tried her?
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Walau till now still dun know $150 the damage. Ling long is my baby. I m her regular. One week at least must piak her twice.....sometimes even 2 sessions....dun say i nv warn u her deepthroat can make u addictted. If u think $150 is too ex for u better do not try her cos may cost u 1200-1500 a month piak her n burn a big hole in yr bloody pocket
|
|
|||
Re: Girls in 1654A
Name: 甜甜 ( looks like 葉子媚)
House: 1654A Looks: 7/10 decent with long dark wavy hair Body: 8/10 32A 24 34 BJ: 7/10 Cat Bath: 5/10 not good/my liking FJ: 5/10 Started in doggy on edge of bed. Acted like she really enjoyed it. Then all of a sudden she stopped the moaning, cfm face changed to normal face and asked to change position..... That's how fake it was. The rest was so so. After that I lied down to rest, she said I was so powerful and lasted so long. Giving excuse that time was almost up. But that wasn't true. At that point in time it was just 35 min in. Anyway I said not true and she said yes; but i wasn't going to argue with her. Overall: 6/10 RTF: No way Last edited by RRR9; 05-09-2015 at 07:35 AM. |
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|