Melbourne Australia - Page 213

Knackers · #**3181** 22-04-2011, 12:19 AM

Thank you for your interest in my personal life.

To put your claims and facts straight instead of twisting things your way, I will make this very clear for you. OK....

Last year I did alot of interstate travel to Melbourne for my business, I stayed in various hotels and I would get my PA to arrange fora WL to come to my room. This is around August and this is when I first saw Rachel, visiting my hotel room. I saw Rachel alot when I came to Melbourne and that's how we exchanged phone numbers. Then in October she went back to Korea.

I finally got my business up and running and moved to Melbourne permanently in late February. I did some research of my own as to which brothels sound interesting and I came across southern comfort and moonlight babes. My first punt was moonlight babes rather than the girl come to me. My own staff mentioned to me not to go to 39 tope as there were some bad reports. So I did not go, then I thought I would see for myself and that's when I met Bianca ( very good )
Since then I have contributed ALOT to this forum, I was surprised when Rachel made contact with me.

I hope this helps you with your interest in how I do things in my private life.

How come you joined this forum march 5th and only had three other posts relating to Casino boy??? Then Casino boy Dissapears?? Are you Casino Boy???

Why not go have a punt yourself and write something positive to us all instead of questioning us.

Steamboat · #**3182** 22-04-2011, 01:43 AM

man not this shit again

Knackers · #**3183** 22-04-2011, 03:30 AM

I agree with you steamboat. We are here for punting not having a go at each other.

HAPPY EASTER PUNTERS !!

sayhello · #**3184** 22-04-2011, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knackers

This is around August and this is when I first saw Rachel, visiting my hotel room. I saw Rachel alot when I came to Melbourne and that's how we exchanged phone numbers. .

Interesting that Rachel would do an outcall back in August when she first started, to a total stranger when she couldnt speak hardly a word of English.

Knackers · #**3185** 22-04-2011, 06:29 AM

나도 동의합니다. 매우 흥미 롭

sayhello · #**3186** 22-04-2011, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knackers

나도 동의합니다. 매우 흥미 롭

I agree all interesting and all not as it seems.

Some guys just dont play straight down the line.

anaconda609 · #**3187** 22-04-2011, 08:00 AM

Knackers, thanks for the detailed response.

I am still trying to get my mind around several parts of your explanation.

You say you saw Rachael back in August as a hotel outcall, then "I saw Rachel alot when I came to Melbourne and that's how we exchanged phone numbers."

I presume these were also all outcalls?

If you had so many sessions with Rachael last year, how come you told us in March that your Moonlight Babes session was your "first punt in Melbourne"?

You said Rachael phoned you to tell you she is back, but you didn't seem to know, or at least didn't share with us, that she has been back for almost three weeks?

When you posted your heads up that Rachael was back, how come you failed to even mention that you had already seen her lots of times last year?

And just out of interest, how much were you paying per hour to see her an an outcall last year?

pocketrocket · #**3188** 22-04-2011, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knackers

GUYS......

I HAVE JUST HAD A PHONE CALL FROM RACHEL.

SHE IS BACK !!!!

Bro pocket pull your head of the sand and get your ass down to 39 !!! NOW !!!

My savings are now going to go !

OMG!!! Sooo busy with work these days my friend...Cant even go to da bathroom

Snapperhead · #**3189** 22-04-2011, 12:14 PM

I have just joined this forum and this in fact, my first post on here and I find this a very intersting read. It's funny that the first thing I read is about a lady who I know a bit about...that lady being "Rachel" from 39 Tope.

I am a "regular" at 39 and in particular, a regular with Rachel and know her pretty well, and speak to her a lot on the phone myself. I was, in fact, her very first customer, on her very first day back at work at 39 three weeks ago. I made sure of that, and was priveleged to know well in advance of her return date with info passed onto me by a friend of hers at 39 and also by people in the know connected to 39.

Knackers, you say that you saw Rachel as an escort in August last year? That's interesting, as I know the 39 management are very cautious as to which customers they send escorts to, and Rachel wouldn't have been around too long as of August last year.

I also know that Rachel has a new phone this year, and didn't even know her own number until she called my number from her new phone in the first booking this year, and we ascertained hat her number was from that. She also said she didn't keep any of her customers numbers from last year, including mine, as she wasn't even 100% sure she was even coming back until a month or so before she did in late March. She doesn't seem like the type to keep a database of numbers either.

As I said, I know Rachel pretty well and have seen her a number of times since she returned. I know she doesn't give her out her number to as many customers as some of other girls do.

So I find your story interesting, and I also doubt it's authenticity to be quite honest.

Rachel is a busy girl and doesn't usually need to tout for business. If she calls me, it isn't for that reason. She doesn't need to.

And even if she was calling you to drum up business, why would she take 3 weeks to do so?

Knackers · #**3190** 22-04-2011, 12:45 PM

Re: Melbourne Australia
Knackers, thanks for the detailed response.

I am still trying to get my mind around several parts of your explanation.

You say you saw Rachael back in August as a hotel outcall, then "I saw Rachel alot when I came to Melbourne and that's how we exchanged phone numbers."

I presume these were also all outcalls?

If you had so many sessions with Rachael last year, how come you told us in March that your Moonlight Babes session was your "first punt in Melbourne"?

It was My first punt IN a brothel

You said Rachael phoned you to tell you she is back, but you didn't seem to know, or at least didn't share with us, that she has been back for almost three weeks?

I did NOT know but when she phoned me you will see by my post that I said I JUST had a call from her

When you posted your heads up that Rachael was back, how come you failed to even mention that you had already seen her lots of times last year?

How many times do I have to say who I saw and when??

And just out of interest, how much were you paying per hour to see her an an outcall last year?

My financial arrangements are nothing to do with you

If you need any more personal information them PM me ok

Knackers · #**3191** 22-04-2011, 12:58 PM

If you knew Rachel has been back for three weeks and you say it's on other forum, then why you not share with us earlier?

mattysong · #**3192** 22-04-2011, 01:09 PM

Bros.

Anyone up for Seven tonight ? I'm going to try my luck there tonight and see if I can hook up with SYTs. Anyone up for it ? PM me .

sefure · #**3193** 22-04-2011, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knackers

나도 동의합니다. 매우 흥미 롭

roflao.. you sound like you're speaking to my great grandmother.. who the hell uses such formal speech on a forum like this??

anaconda609 · #**3194** 22-04-2011, 01:44 PM

I asked Knackers:-

"And just out of interest, how much were you paying per hour to see her on an outcall last year?"

Knackers helpful reply was:-

"My financial arrangements are nothing to do with you"

FFS Knackers, since when has it been private information how much we pay for sessions with parlour girls??

If you really did have lots of outcall sessions with Rachael last year, then you would know off the top of your head how much No.39's standard charge is per hour outcall to a hotel.

Some of your other answers seem equally shifty

Your refusal to answer just puts you story about Rachael into even more doubt.

anaconda609 · #**3195** 22-04-2011, 03:50 PM

It looks like I am not the only one who is skeptical of Knackers story about Rachael.

Sayhello expressed his doubt, "I agree all interesting and all not as it seems. Some guys just dont play straight down the line."

Now Snapperhead has provided some disturbing evidence to throw even more doubt:-

"I also know that Rachel has a new phone this year, and didn't even know her own number until she called my number from her new phone in the first booking this year, and we ascertained hat her number was from that. She also said she didn't keep any of her customers numbers from last year, including mine, as she wasn't even 100% sure she was even coming back until a month or so before she did in late March. She doesn't seem like the type to keep a database of numbers either.

So I find your story interesting, and I also doubt it's authenticity to be quite honest."

I look forward to Knackers response with interest.

I repeat what I said in my first post on this topic...."Knackers, you have certainly made useful contributions to this forum in the past six weeks, but some things just don't add up."

I have no idea why Knackers would want to be hiding the real story of his past punting exploits in Melbourne, but the more he tries to "explain" his story, the more he casts doubt on its authenticity and on his personal credibility.

Perhaps he might also explain why he commented on the legendary status of Yoyo and Yumi? The comment certainly sounded like he had also booked them on lots of occasions. No doubt he will try to tell us that he has only read about them on the forums