My very own cui sexual encounters.

[Toyota Honda]

Originally Posted by KingEros

In this context, I take it that "cui" means 碎 ... as in "broken English". But just WTF is the "cui" doing in the title?

Hmm.. I take it as it means crisp as in crispy, layman's meaning fantastic, tok kong, sipeh ho, sedap no horse run...

So the title reads as ..... My very own crisp sexual encounters.

so if I am right, I think TS English is quite good... 'O' Level examiner would regard the verb crisp as a beautiful aptly used word..

[KingEros]

Originally Posted by Toyota Honda

Hmm.. I take it as it means crisp as in crispy, layman's meaning fantastic, tok kong, sipeh ho, sedap no horse run...

Not trying to sound big-headed here ... but "crisp" can only be used in "potato crisps", "crispy chips" & "crisply ironed shirt".
So, which Layman's Dictionary states that it has any correlations to "fantastic", "tok kong", "sipeh ho", "sidap", "no horse run"?

Originally Posted by Toyota Honda

So the title reads as ..... My very own crisp sexual encounters.

So linking the title to your layman theory, it should read as "我的脆脆性爱故事"? ... & what sense is it supposed to make?
See? You also just "made the best guess" from what TS has written ... which is exactly the gist of the whole issue: incomprehensibility.

Originally Posted by Toyota Honda

so if I am right, I think TS English is quite good... 'O' Level examiner would regard the verb crisp as a beautiful aptly used word..

Usually, the whole world (not just O-level examiners) think of poets having "aptly used beautiful words" only after they are long gone from their own mortal existence ... but my point is: try reading up on the differences between adjectives & adverbs, before you even think about judging whether other people's English is (quite) good or not.

[KingEros]

Originally Posted by slider_72

To improve must mean that TS should be able to accept constructive criticisms. No one here expects everyone to post in perfect English free of grammatical and spelling errors. It would however be easier on the reader if the person posting his message avoids words which he/she created.

It took me a while before I realised what "cui" meant.

Surely it is possible to post in normal simple plain English without inserting anglicised Hokkien words? If TS wants to convey a word or phrase in Chinese, might be easier to write it in Chinese instead.

Exactly ...
Anybody who post in this or any other forum did it for a purpose ... whether to gain points, make friends, get answers, share experiences, etc.

If what has been posted cannot even be comprehended ... not to mention the fact that it was a deliberation to make it incomprehensible, then would the TS stand a chance of attaining his original purpose? In other words, it's a waste of his time.

On the readers' end, it's also a waste of (our) time ... since the thread served no purpose (until this discussion of "reading comprehension" began), then surely it also is a waste of bandwidth?

[tomcat007]

So can anyone please tell me what does "cui" means?

I still catch no ball leh...

[ericgo18]

from TS story telling to english lessons...

[Niceman]

Originally Posted by KingEros

If what has been posted cannot even be comprehended ... not to mention the fact that it was a deliberation to make it incomprehensible, then would the TS stand a chance of attaining his original purpose? In other words, it's a waste of his time.

Wah bro, your england very the powderful.... hehe...

All I can say is, welcome to the new generation of novel in Singlish, by the author, The Sinspear (instead of shakespear)

[Bangster]

Originally Posted by Blue_Blue

what standard of English are you expecting then?

if you really expecting perfect English, i suggest you visit forums in UK. i think majority of the posting are not in good English. As long they can be apprehended, I think its DAMN fine.

Am I expecting too much? Seriously, ask yourself, this type of juvenile writing skills can get you interested, if at all? Do you belong to TS' clique, or generation? Or are you HIM actually?

Originally Posted by Blue_Blue

..if you feel aroused because of good English, I damn strongly suggest that you read The Straits Times everyday and wank yourself.

I am putting to you the suggestion you have got it wrong in the beginning of the above quoted paragraph. Let's just put it this way - using bad English to write a sexy story is a sure way for putting people off. It has nothing to do with getting aroused with good English and reading the Straits Times. I'm sure you are more intelligent than to come up with a suggestion like that.

Why are you so worked up in your reply to me? From the way you speak, I doubt you are a person who finds this type of story sexually interesting.

Don't just ask me to give the bugger a chance. Give yourself one too.

[geckoSG]

Plenty of room for improvement on how to make the encounter saucy.
Read the story and dun feel keen to follow up anymore... My point of view.

[Return]

Please carry on with your story.

[FunGuy70]

hahahha...sex story become grammer lesson...interesting.... TS dare not write anymore...

[jiejielover]

the topic has changed.
-.-"

[otamay]

We all have been left hanging in the air by the cui TS. So what's next now?
What we want is someone who write and others can understand, no need to second guess or even third guess! Thio bow??

[traci_li]

That's a very good story