Unrepentant Fake Lexus Owner

[newyorker88]

Originally Posted by ObamaRocks

Bro newyorker88, i too have been zapped beyond comprehension, but hey, point is important to me, especially as a newbie.
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 09-08-2009 02:16 AM cease barking!
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 11:54 PM u dunono ki lkti sjy eng als err quwret jf; lo ak alale yroed ghny kqkw pockr ereye tyuid apo
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 11:38 PM u dan qui lan
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 10:53 PM well said Mr Ho
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 10:42 PM nothing to do?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 10:19 PM kpkb for wat?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 09:49 PM y so rude?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 09:25 PM fuck u ...u talk too much zap u
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 09:16 PM u talk too long.just let this thread die off quietly for Christ's sake.

Nope, I am not standing here to say that if Ah Ho is the culprit,

The comments left by the zapper is about the same as mine, same guy or clones? as usual, dare not leave nicks. What a loser.

Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 11-08-2009 09:27 AM double head snake not impnt then why bark
The Plight PRC whore in... 10-08-2009 07:47 PM as if u r a prc guru. zap u
acanthus
Escape from N... 10-08-2009 07:13 AM RACIST
Batam Info Thread 09-08-2009 10:14 PM how you know you think you batam king, you only batam newbie
Batam Info Thread 09-08-2009 11:17 AM sad, but necessary. So ZAP U
Escape from N... 09-08-2009 08:39 AM i bo chap you also, c u complain i very siax

Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 06-08-2009 07:16 AM why you being up things again, let it cool down
pls
This will be what... 05-08-2009 02:03 PM so high pt still complain


Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 04-08-2009 01:50 PM ..


Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 03-08-2009 11:40 AM ...
Germany - All you can... 02-08-2009 05:29 PM cheap like you? hahahahaha
Germany - All you can... 01-08-2009 08:26 PM if you know nothing, keep your mouth shut.

[paulsun]

Post details to me or post big big here....i will do the rest. Told you guys not to let this moron go free oredi.

[newyorker88]

Originally Posted by cliffy

steady liao loh.
Pg 2 New Paper.

matter of time b4 his family members are informed of his activities

Can anyone post the news?

[newyorker88]

Originally Posted by Chia

What really caught me by surprised isn't Ho's revenge but the mentality of some like-minded members (you know who you are) who stood on the side of Ho and deemed it appropriate for him to rob the FL. Sign...... but of course, no one is perfect. There are bound to be hardcore criminals and psycho freaks who disregard the law and human principle. Take good care and may karma catch up with you.


Cheers!

To sum it up, Ho could have adverted all these, if he quietly stay away from this forum after paying 100 dollars, and apologise.

Hard core criminals who rob FLs? Sorry to them, crime does pay. Does not matter what business, you want something, you pay for it, unless someone gives to you free.

Lets hope this incident serves a warning to all who think of robbing a FL.

All of us knows very well, why a woman who do this line. And the stigma that was attached to this line. No need to make them suffer more than they need, by robbing what they work so hard for.

This is the reason why I stand by the FL who got robbed.

I am no saint myself, but certainly do not stand by to watch someone getting robbed either.

[Major_Ace]

Originally Posted by newyorker88

"I am no saint myself, but certainly do not stand by to watch someone getting robbed either."

Bro, I 100% agree with you on this!

[DO_YOU_BJ]

Originally Posted by Chia

We shall see about it.

As much as I know, I still maintain the fact that it is not necessary to proceed a criminal case against an accused person without a victim.

Well... let say 10 - 20 people write to Head Investigation (HI) from Bedok Police Division, cc to Ministry of Home Affairs and AG's Chamber and throw in the newspaper write-out on page 2 & 3 (I was told that it would also be in Wanbao as it requires translation from English to Mandarin), I really doubt that the Police will just ignore the case. Please note that Impersonating as a Police Officer thereby committing robbery resulting in wrongful gain and wrongful loss is a very serious offense which carries a severe punishment of maximum 14 years jail and cane.

To be honest, Mr Ho could have prevented all this from happening if he is remorseful for his action and come forth with a sincere apology. Instead, he harboured a grudge against all those who exposed him and created a mis-leading article in Asiaone forum with an intent to seek revenge against members in this forum and the FLs.

What really caught me by surprised isn't Ho's revenge but the mentality of some like-minded members (you know who you are) who stood on the side of Ho and deemed it appropriate for him to rob the FL. Sign...... but of course, no one is perfect. There are bound to be hardcore criminals and psycho freaks who disregard the law and human principle. Take good care and may karma catch up with you.

Oh, last but not least, you mean to say that you have no idea why you are zapped? Huh, what right is right and what wrong is wrong! Think!!!

Cheers!

Just because people dun stand behind your notion doesnt mean they're on the side of Ah Ho
Who the fuck said Ah Ho was rite in the 1st place?
Everyone here in this thread mentioned what's wrong is wrong but the way this thing is handled is wrong from the very start.
Again, if you have portrayed yourself to be so "INTELLIGENT" in the 1st place, you would have read in detail of what people posted.
Zap means shit la, oh pls gimme a break about zaps.

Allow me to repeat, like i did on my very 1st post in this thread, i am on nobody's side, just that this is all wrong.
One robbed a whore...yeah he's a dick.....
The other protecting a whore....for his own personal endeavour....
So wats rite & wats wrong??????

Here's my take & do read carefully, cos i REPEAT, i dun take sides, cos all to me are fucking DUMB FUCKS!

The law can only persecute an individual under 3 conditions:

1) The victim appears in court for the case
Doesn't mean if the whore in this case is interviewed by the police, they can as good as nab Ah Ho, sentence must be passed by a judge for the whole case to close!
2) The police, with the power invested in them, can interview Ah Ho without interviewing the Whore at all. All that is needed is for Ah Ho to give a confession of his dirty deeds or give a FORCED confession of his dirty deeds for the prosecution to stand without the whore ever appearing!
3) This one is a bit far fetched, but another possibility is that, Ah Ho has prior conviction of similar nature, thus the case and the criminal is a clear cut case.

Now, why do I bother to keep hogging on this thread?
Here's my motive and all reading, please read carefully!

Man robs whore>>ok all know liao
Guys go after robber>> Old news liao
watever happen in between the actual case between the bros in the forum not important

Whore should be very well aware of this saga & how its unfolding

TS, from reading his post, is no ordinary friend to this particular whore

TS is all out to prevent Whore from being exposed...for obvious reasons

Whore is here to make an indecent living, riding on a student pass

Police case happens, like now since it appears on the papers etc etc

Police will have to fulfill the 3 conditions as above for a case to even start

Unless Ah Ho confesses to all his deeds, the VICTIM MUST relate the incident meaning testify in court!

Now, if this is gonna go on trial, Ah Ho will not be allowed to leave country n his passport will be compounded by the authorities

This will not be applicable for the whore for she aint the accused

But dun look at the surface, look deeper
If the case blows to court, the whore will have to testify!
Ok, so if that's the case, Ah Ho can move to Changi liao but then the whore?
110% she'll be deported & guaranteed never be allowed to step foot on our soil again.

Assuming the whore has last minute jitters, she WILL RUN! Now this is a very common trait among PRCs, so trial day, no show!
Case gets thrown out of the window, Ah Ho walks free and the Whore still gets banned from entering forever

Ah Ho can engage a defamation suit to go after all those who were after him, after all, no witness or victim, no case.........so who then has the leading edge???????

Now based on all these, who actually has the last laugh and what will the most likelihood outcome be???????
To me, it's clear as water already, that's Y i got involved in this thread!

[DO_YOU_BJ]

Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 11-08-2009 12:19 PM No ned to act so powderful, so what you high pointers

To this zapper, sorry, i am not trying to act powderful, you feel so cause you're weak.
I can feel it, trust me......

[paulsun]

Give me more details like address and I make sure appear newspaper. Come on all act hero not one can help me?

[newyorker88]

Originally Posted by DO_YOU_BJ

Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 11-08-2009 12:19 PM No ned to act so powderful, so what you high pointers

To this zapper, sorry, i am not trying to act powderful, you feel so cause you're weak.
I can feel it, trust me.....

Dont bother lah. They are weaklings who dare not post their nicks after they zap other, and they feel so good. I kena dono how many liao. At least when boss zap, he state the reason why.

[DO_YOU_BJ]

Dun worry bro newyorker88, i am not the least bothered.But I'd really wanna c the outcome of this case, my gut tells me, all will loose!

[Chia]

Originally Posted by DO_YOU_BJ

Just because people dun stand behind your notion doesnt mean they're on the side of Ah Ho
Who the fuck said Ah Ho was rite in the 1st place?

First & foremost, I did not point my finger at you. Sad to say... there are clones of Ho and his supporters from the way I got zapped. Some of those who zapped are seniors in this forum; zapping for 3 points and above. Hence, my statement is more on the general appeal. 9 samsters have zapped. Isn't this clear enough to suggest that some of those who wrote in a nasty manner against TS, accepted Ho's action? Some of them even disputed that whores are meant to be treated as such!

Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 11-08-2009 12:13 PM look deeper next time
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 11-08-2009 11:22 AM Do you have any ideal why you are been ZAP?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 06:14 PM i thought points are not important to you ?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 07-08-2009 11:21 AM I like to zap you and make fun of Beng can?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 06-08-2009 04:48 PM wah your points go up very fast
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 05-08-2009 05:00 PM wat good if you are quoting law cases if neither party dun report to police ?
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 05-08-2009 09:05 AM waste of bandwidth
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 04-08-2009 06:44 PM haha ... you dun even know the first step of the legal process ...
Unrepentant Fake Lexus... 04-08-2009 05:14 PM i seriously doubt you are a lawyer ...

Originally Posted by DO_YOU_BJ

The law can only persecute an individual under 3 conditions:

1) The victim appears in court for the case
Doesn't mean if the whore in this case is interviewed by the police, they can as good as nab Ah Ho, sentence must be passed by a judge for the whole case to close!
2) The police, with the power invested in them, can interview Ah Ho without interviewing the Whore at all. All that is needed is for Ah Ho to give a confession of his dirty deeds or give a FORCED confession of his dirty deeds for the prosecution to stand without the whore ever appearing!
3) This one is a bit far fetched, but another possibility is that, Ah Ho has prior conviction of similar nature, thus the case and the criminal is a clear cut case.

Point (1) is correct.

Point (2) is partially correct. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, Police can investigate into a seizable offence without prior information from a victim. As for forced confession, the statement can be easily thrown out. In context, an accused person's statement is different from an informant's statement which has the clause under Section 180 of Penal Code, Chapter 224. However, Police can collate credible evidences and still trial Ho in Court with consensus from a Deputy Public Prosecutor in AG's Chamber.

Point (3) is partially correct. However, the antecedent record of an accused person can only be used for sentencing, such as preventive or deterent punishment, but not as an evidence to suggest him/her guilty of the offence.

E'nuf said from me on this thread. I have done what I can to write to the press and the Police to prove that it isn't NATO. I am glad that Ho's case has been published on TheNewPaper dated 11 August 2009. I am satisfied with the interim reply from the Police to assure me that they will look into the matter and thanking me for providing the information.

Now, I will just wait to know that Ho will eventually be punished. Like I have said, Ho is believed to be suffering from a psychotic disorder which resulted in his actions since 2004. He will continue his act if nothing is done. He sees no remorse and only wanted revenge for exposing him.

[slider_72]

Originally Posted by DO_YOU_BJ

The law can only persecute an individual under 3 conditions:

1) The victim appears in court for the case
Doesn't mean if the whore in this case is interviewed by the police, they can as good as nab Ah Ho, sentence must be passed by a judge for the whole case to close!
2) The police, with the power invested in them, can interview Ah Ho without interviewing the Whore at all. All that is needed is for Ah Ho to give a confession of his dirty deeds or give a FORCED confession of his dirty deeds for the prosecution to stand without the whore ever appearing!
3) This one is a bit far fetched, but another possibility is that, Ah Ho has prior conviction of similar nature, thus the case and the criminal is a clear cut case.

Thought I would just jump in and contribute my 0.02 cents of public information.

Point 1 mentioned by Bro DYBJ. Making police report means the police would be kept busy for a while lah. They have a duty to investigate. But the decision whether to prefer a charge against Mr Ho would depend on the Attorney General's Chambers, while it is up to the judge to decide whether Mr Ho is guilty and if so, what is the sentence to be imposed.

So making a police report is but the first step. The whole process can be terminated anywhere along the line. Also, even if Mr Ho is charged, chances of him being convicted is quite low lah.

Firstly, the WL must attend Court and give evidence of what happened. If she is not in Court, what we have is merely hearsay evidence which is not admissible in evidence. I quote from the Evidence Act below.

Proof of facts by oral evidence
61. All facts, except the contents of documents, may be proved by oral evidence.

Oral evidence must be direct
62. —(1) Oral evidence must in all cases whatever be direct —

(a) if it refers to a fact which could be seen, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he saw that fact;

(b) if it refers to a fact which could be heard, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he heard that fact;

(c) if it refers to a fact which could be perceived by any other sense or in any other manner, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he perceived that fact by that sense or in that manner;

(d) if it refers to an opinion or to the grounds on which that opinion is held, it must be the evidence of the person who holds that opinion on those grounds.


Point 2. Although Mr Ho can be convicted based on his admission, getting an admission of the crime committed is not going to be easy. Also, convicting someone based on an admission is not easy either. Again extracts of the Evidence Act is pasted below.

Confession caused by inducement, threat or promise when irrelevant in criminal proceeding
24. A confession made by an accused person is irrelevant in a criminal proceeding if the making of the confession appears to the court to have been caused by any inducement, threat or promise having reference to the charge against the accused person, proceeding from a person in authority and sufficient in the opinion of the court to give the accused person grounds which would appear to him reasonable for supposing that by making it he would gain any advantage or avoid any evil of a temporal nature in reference to the proceeding against him.

Confession to police officer below the rank of sergeant not to be proved
25. *No confession made to a police officer who is below the rank of sergeant by a person accused of any offence shall be proved as against the person.

*See also section 122 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 68).

Confession by accused while in custody of police not to be proved against him
26. Subject to any express provision in any written law, no confession made by any person whilst he is in the custody of a police officer, unless it is made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, shall be proved as against the person.

How much of information received from accused may be proved
27. When any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether such information amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered may be proved.


Point 3 is even more difficult for a conviction to take place. Similar fact evidence is admitted to corroborate other evidence that is adduced. In the absence of any evidence of the offence complained of, it would be rare indeed to base a conviction solely on similar fact evidence.


End of the day, unless Whore is willing to attend court and give evidence against Ho, all the recent human flesh search engine against Ho is likely to be of no real use.

[zapme]

its just like if there is no seed in the soil no matter how much water or fertilizers u put oso no plant will grow.

[slider_72]

Originally Posted by Chia

Point (2) is partially correct. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, Police can investigate into a seizable offence without prior information from a victim. As for forced confession, the statement can be easily thrown out. In context, an accused person's statement is different from an informant's statement which has the clause under Section 180 of Penal Code, Chapter 224. However, Police can collate credible evidences and still trial Ho in Court with consensus from a Deputy Public Prosecutor in AG's Chamber.

Point (3) is partially correct. However, the antecedent record of an accused person can only be used for sentencing, such as preventive or deterent punishment, but not as an evidence to suggest him/her guilty of the offence.

E'nuf said from me on this thread. I have done what I can to write to the press and the Police to prove that it isn't NATO. I am glad that Ho's case has been published on TheNewPaper dated 11 August 2009. I am satisfied with the interim reply from the Police to assure me that they will look into the matter and thanking me for providing the information.

Section 180 of the Penal Code???? What is the relevance of Section 180 of the Penal Code in this discussion? Section 180 of the Penal Code says this;

Refusing to sign statement
180. Whoever refuses to sign any statement made by him, when required to sign that statement by a public servant legally competent to require that he shall sign that statement, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 months, or with fine which may extend to $2,500, or with both.

Frankly, apart from the Whore giving evidence of what happened, I doubt whether there will be any other credible evidence of the commission of the offence. CCTV footages?

On your comments about point 3, there is a difference between antecedents and similar fact evidence. Antecedents mean what other crimes the accused have committed before. Loosely speaking, similar fact evidence means what other crimes of identical or similar nature that the accused have been convicted before. Whilst a person's antecedents will be regarded when it comes to sentencing, similar fact evidence may be adduced to corroborate other evidence when it comes to proving the guilt of the accused.

[DO_YOU_BJ]

Finally, The Lawyer has appeared!
Nabei, wat took you so long?????
lol
Tks bro...if anyone can tok law, it's definitely you, cos its ur ricebowl
Well, it goes to show, people are using bombastic stuff to smoke those who are ignorant about, in this case, LAW!
You being here, just 2 post, shed so much light...man..i'm amazed!