(cunt) King's Latest Party Gals

[nakamitchi]

Originally Posted by cuntking

bro nakamitchi, I don't believe in exposing personal details on clients (and gals) or making personal remarks and attacks on people here in the open forum

already did my part passing the details to the gals in contact with me, okts of the different houses as well as bros who know me personally to pass the message to their regular gals

I don't believe in purposely expose something for no valid reason,or to sabo innocent.But if yr purpose is to make known this matter to Okts or Wls........i believe beside passing personal info to people u have known,pen down on this forum the info will be more faster n very effective due to the exposure of chongsters in this forum.Anyway u already given info to people ard u,it make no difference to share to bros. over here if this is the truth rite.Already got many girls to satisfy our personal lust in this secret whoring lifestyle,video down for wat banana reason????......ban this type of pervert people,let them go elsewhere do their shit n we can enjoy our GL peacefully.......150 dollars to bed hundreds of girls at our own choices anytime we wanted to is already not costly n save time,imagine wasting amt of time n money spend to woo a normal girl n bed her, why create issues.......expose them........just my pt of view.......

[faithevans]

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

Nope. Not me. But do share more details of this guy who was acting weird

Did he talk to himself or was he dressed funny? I seen a few weirdos around. The weirdest ones to me are those who feel comfy behaving like a guard dog in certain houses, hanging there all day playing with their iPad, giving other customers weird looks and handing out unwanted advice on girls like they're some Lao Jiao but in truth don't know shit.

Hope you're not one of those guys.

hmm...kinda weird if this guy's not you.

The dates dont tally up.

16/10

I also only have one nick bro. Go to 1612? I rather stay at home and watch paint dry

22/10

Thought hard and long whether I should post this, but after searching my heart, I felt I had to be fair to bros here.

Was asked to give 1612 another chance, so with open heart and mind, decided to give a try to the much talked about so-called hot Ang pai of 1612, Ling Ling.

24/10

Nope. Not me. But do share more details of this guy who was acting weird

so..16th you expressed the reluctance to go to 1612...citing that you'll rather stay home and watch paint dry...

22nd you FRed on Lin Lin...apparently after going back on your words and deciding to give 1612 a chance.



24/10

Nope. Not me. But do share more details of this guy who was acting weird

24th you said that weird fella around noon wasnt you.

hmm..


Lin Lin was not working from 16-19, 19-22 did ALL RTFs with the exception of the weird guy...so if you are not the weird guy...you must be one of the RTFs?

The gals record each and every customer they fuck in a small little black book...with clear descriptions of how they look..what they prefer..and their numbers if any...

I am just baffled by the above..

[cuntking]

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

decided to give a try to the much talked about so-called hot Ang pai of 1612, Ling Ling.

Originally Posted by faithevans

hmm...kinda weird if this guy's not you.

Lin Lin was not working from 16-19, 19-22 did ALL RTFs with the exception of the weird guy...so if you are not the weird guy...you must be one of the RTFs?

The gals record each and every customer they fuck in a small little black book...with clear descriptions of how they look..what they prefer..and their numbers if any...

I am just baffled by the above..

So GB did you RTF Lin Lin? which date? What time? Come on proof to us you did call her from HQ

bro faith, how come you know so well about when she not working, are you the one she call LG?

[faithevans]

no leh...she refused to fuck me....TMD....said she scared

[Doomas]

BG

It is quite clear that you are waging a personal crusade against 1612, moving from unsubstantiated criticisms of the gals there to a critique of the furnishing. I honestly think no one replied to your ultimatum for a FR on Ling Ling simply they could not be bothered and I also honestly think no one would believe your FR anyway. Most of the ladies in 1612 I believe are able to hold their ground despite whatever aspersions you may attempt to cast on them. Their bookings average at least 5 customers a day per WL; that’s five people per WL who do not agree with your opinions. As for Ling Ling, you seem rather eager to find fault with her, and jumped at bro Omnia’s description of her as an excuse to decry the FRs from other cheongsters. It is noteworthy that your unsubstantiated scathing had drawn ire from a few Ling Ling fans and that you did not challenge them. Few can fault Ling Ling on her service, so you chose to attack from the looks angle knowing that may find traction as looks are indeed subjective. She herself clocks at least six a day, that’s six joes who do not agree with you.

Every seasoned player knows that looks are subjective and a great experience is never guaranteed, a fact which seemed to have escaped you; what’s sweet to some may be spicy to others, or in your case, 1612 vintage is all vinegar to you. When bro ArthurKop wrote about his disappointment with Tong Tong, you took the opportunity to slap on a generous dollop of vitriol on the house. Yet when he clarified that it was perhaps because he didn’t click with her you kept silent, presumably bcz it wouldn’t help your cause to reply. I also note that you neglected to mention the fact that I did not post any experiential FR on Tong Tong but rather just a description of her, which included her long legs. Of course I should not have expected you to draw attention to this since it also wouldn’t advance your cause.

There also appear to be other glaring inconsistencies in your claims. You said the gals in the house all cannot make it in terms of looks and service; I take that to mean all without exception. Now, how would you know unless you had tried all of them, right from this house’ first batch of PRC WLs all the way to this current batch? If indeed you had, where are your FRs? There should be at least a few seeing that you have been a forum member for some years and that you wanted to "expose" the truth. When bro kevinktong wrote a glowing FR on SiSi, you not only did not slam him but also asked him how he would compare her to other gals in GL in terms of look and service. You would not have asked that if you had already seen and would be able to compare with your so-called vast number of sightings.

More than that, you seem very eager to get people here to refer to your so-called list of top WLs. That is quite likely to appeal to the newbies but not the seniors. And the newbies, once trying the ang pais from 1612 as recommended by whichever OKTs they visit, which is quite likely – I have seldom seen Ling Ling or Si Si or some of the others returning from an outhouse parade - will likely wonder why they were not in your list and lose faith in you. I can accept a little self importance, perhaps even a little narcissism but self absorption to the point that you start to inflate over others, well, that’s not jolly.

Enjoy your brief moment in the sun firing your imaginary salvos, bcz other joes will be enjoying theirs with the 1612 WLs.

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

I've already given a warning shot that's likely grazed the skin and burnt a few hairs of those running and supporting this house.

I don't think I should go all the way to take someone's head off, as there'll be no way to recover from that and it'll be plain mean.

I think 1612's OKT has a good attitude and hopefully he'll take this feedback positively and improve things like getting better quality girls lookswise, making sure service is up to par at all times, and encouraging more honest FRs and feedback from his hardcore loyalists, cos I can almost bet my bottom dollar that he knows those who have been writing some of these over-the-top FRs for YEARS.

I mean, lookswise, there's no way any of the girls in the house right now can get more than a 6, seriously. Most are 5/10 and a couple just plain fail.

And the rooms are kinda old and need new paint. Suggest to install more mirrors too.

[BronzeGod]

Your post below is so all over the place, it'd be a waste of time to respond to every convoluted sentence.

I don't have a personal crusade against 1612, but I do take notice of folks who consistently write exaggerated FRs and seem to have an agenda to promote.

In this case, you and cuntking have been writing almost exclusively about 1612 for about three years or more.

Rather than beat around the bush and attempt to confuse, how about answering us why you have been doing that for a good few years? And after I pointed it out repeatedly, you and cuntking suddenly and almost in tandem, started venturing into other threads almost for the first time in YEARS.

Strange don't you think?

So answer me this:


1) Why have you and cuntking been writing exclusively about 1612 for a few years and constantly giving the girls sky-high ratings and gushing over them like they be hot pretty syts and also coining "brandnames" for them like "air geylang" and "deepthroat secondary, etc. Explain you behavior pls.

2) after a few years of doing the above and almost never venturing into other threads in the legal scene, why have you and cuntking suddenly popped up to post in other threads almost at the same time and on the same day yesterday?

Please explain

Originally Posted by Doomas

BG

It is quite clear that you are waging a personal crusade against 1612, moving from unsubstantiated criticisms of the gals there to a critique of the furnishing. I honestly think no one replied to your ultimatum for a FR on Ling Ling simply they could not be bothered and I also honestly think no one would believe your FR anyway. Most of the ladies in 1612 I believe are able to hold their ground despite whatever aspersions you may attempt to cast on them. Their bookings average at least 5 customers a day per WL; that’s five people per WL who do not agree with your opinions. As for Ling Ling, you seem rather eager to find fault with her, and jumped at bro Omnia’s description of her as an excuse to decry the FRs from other cheongsters. It is noteworthy that your unsubstantiated scathing had drawn ire from a few Ling Ling fans and that you did not challenge them. Few can fault Ling Ling on her service, so you chose to attack from the looks angle knowing that may find traction as looks are indeed subjective. She herself clocks at least six a day, that’s six joes who do not agree with you.

Every seasoned player knows that looks are subjective and a great experience is never guaranteed, a fact which seemed to have escaped you; what’s sweet to some may be spicy to others, or in your case, 1612 vintage is all vinegar to you. When bro ArthurKop wrote about his disappointment with Tong Tong, you took the opportunity to slap on a generous dollop of vitriol on the house. Yet when he clarified that it was perhaps because he didn’t click with her you kept silent, presumably bcz it wouldn’t help your cause to reply. I also note that you neglected to mention the fact that I did not post any experiential FR on Tong Tong but rather just a description of her, which included her long legs. Of course I should not have expected you to draw attention to this since it also wouldn’t advance your cause.

There also appear to be other glaring inconsistencies in your claims. You said the gals in the house all cannot make it in terms of looks and service; I take that to mean all without exception. Now, how would you know unless you had tried all of them, right from this house’ first batch of PRC WLs all the way to this current batch? If indeed you had, where are your FRs? There should be at least a few seeing that you have been a forum member for some years and that you wanted to "expose" the truth. When bro kevinktong wrote a glowing FR on SiSi, you not only did not slam him but also asked him how he would compare her to other gals in GL in terms of look and service. You would not have asked that if you had already seen and would be able to compare with your so-called vast number of sightings.

More than that, you seem very eager to get people here to refer to your so-called list of top WLs. That is quite likely to appeal to the newbies but not the seniors. And the newbies, once trying the ang pais from 1612 as recommended by whichever OKTs they visit, which is quite likely – I have seldom seen Ling Ling or Si Si or some of the others returning from an outhouse parade - will likely wonder why they were not in your list and lose faith in you. I can accept a little self importance, perhaps even a little narcissism but self absorption to the point that you start to inflate over others, well, that’s not jolly.

Enjoy your brief moment in the sun firing your imaginary salvos, bcz other joes will be enjoying theirs with the 1612 WLs.

[BronzeGod]

Hi faithevans,

Which customer I am is not the point.

Putting all these dates here are also meaningless.

But if you feel such things are of meaning, perhaps I should station someone to monitor the comings and goings in 1612 to figure out who you all are. Perhaps I can record down license plates and take photos of you guys and ask forummers if they recognize those people and if any of them is you?

Seriously, I don't think we want to be so pedantic and end up going down that slippery slope. It could mean a lot of trouble for everyone.

Catch my drift?

Originally Posted by faithevans

hmm...kinda weird if this guy's not you.

The dates dont tally up.

16/10




22/10




24/10



so..16th you expressed the reluctance to go to 1612...citing that you'll rather stay home and watch paint dry...

22nd you FRed on Lin Lin...apparently after going back on your words and deciding to give 1612 a chance.



24/10



24th you said that weird fella around noon wasnt you.

hmm..


Lin Lin was not working from 16-19, 19-22 did ALL RTFs with the exception of the weird guy...so if you are not the weird guy...you must be one of the RTFs?

The gals record each and every customer they fuck in a small little black book...with clear descriptions of how they look..what they prefer..and their numbers if any...

I am just baffled by the above..

[Stressedboi]

Bro BG, everything all the 1612 supporters here regarding Ling Ling is true. She has a huge list of RTF customers. I personally think her service and attitude is great. After calling her a few times at 1651 i've seen customers waiting in the house take her immediately upon walking out. To each his own I guess. Also nowadays when people ask for commandos and 1651 girls do not suit, Gordon tends to call her over from 1612.

I only patronize 1612 for Ling Ling, so I feel my opinions are fairly unbiased, i prefer to call from Gordon's house. Just my 2 cents worth.

[BronzeGod]

Originally Posted by Stressedboi

Bro BG, everything all the 1612 supporters here regarding Ling Ling is true. She has a huge list of RTF customers. I personally think her service and attitude is great. After calling her a few times at 1651 i've seen customers waiting in the house take her immediately upon walking out. To each his own I guess. Also nowadays when people ask for commandos and 1651 girls do not suit, Gordon tends to call her over from 1612.

I only patronize 1612 for Ling Ling, so I feel my opinions are fairly unbiased, i prefer to call from Gordon's house. Just my 2 cents worth.

Your two cents worth is much appreciated. Thank you for your contributions and have a pleasant day ahead!

[Doomas]

Convoluted? I don't think so. I think my points were laid out clearly enough. Even a relative new member bro stressboi whom I'm not acquainted with felt compelled to speak up in defence of Ling Ling. And I note that you did not refute his comments on Ling Ling whom you were lambasting. However, if you are really that disorientated, pls let me know so that I can spell out my points in an even clearer manner. If I was misrepresenting you I hardly think you would turn down the opportunity to clarify things.

Strange, don't you think so?

To add on, your critique now seems to be meandering all over the place. You started off with lambasting all the 1612 WLs without any substantiated FRs, moved on to a critique of the furnishing, and are now wondering why I posted in other threads. This does not align with your so called "mission" to investigate FRs, and is stark and clear testimony that your agenda is indeed personal and cannot be disguised at all.

Since you feel you have to be fair to bros here as you had stated in an earlier post, why not first address my points raised in my immediate past post to you before I reply to your questions? I believe I raised them first so I think itz only fair. That you chose to reply to my points with questions is quite puzzling.

Quite strange, don't you think so?

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

Your post below is so all over the place, it'd be a waste of time to respond to every convoluted sentence.

I don't have a personal crusade against 1612, but I do take notice of folks who consistently write exaggerated FRs and seem to have an agenda to promote.

In this case, you and cuntking have been writing almost exclusively about 1612 for about three years or more.

Rather than beat around the bush and attempt to confuse, how about answering us why you have been doing that for a good few years? And after I pointed it out repeatedly, you and cuntking suddenly and almost in tandem, started venturing into other threads almost for the first time in YEARS.

Strange don't you think?

So answer me this:


1) Why have you and cuntking been writing exclusively about 1612 for a few years and constantly giving the girls sky-high ratings and gushing over them like they be hot pretty syts and also coining "brandnames" for them like "air geylang" and "deepthroat secondary, etc. Explain you behavior pls.

2) after a few years of doing the above and almost never venturing into other threads in the legal scene, why have you and cuntking suddenly popped up to post in other threads almost at the same time and on the same day yesterday?

Please explain

[BronzeGod]

The questions that I've posed have been posed to you several times before your latest post below.

However, you simply refuse to answer about you and cuntking's agenda in posting almost exclusively about 1612 inthe 1612 threads whenever you post anything about the legal geylang scene.

Instead, you're trying hard to distract others by going round in circles about all sorts of other things instead of getting to the point.

Whatever it is, my objective has been achieved in exposing you and cuntking's FRs as one-sidedly promoting the girls in just one house for years, so there's no need for me to belabour things any longer

Good day!

Originally Posted by Doomas

Convoluted? I don't think so. I think my points were laid out clearly enough. Even a relative new member bro stressboi whom I'm not acquainted with felt compelled to speak up in defence of Ling Ling. And I note that you did not refute his comments on Ling Ling whom you were lambasting. However, if you are really that disorientated, pls let me know so that I can spell out my points in an even clearer manner. If I was misrepresenting you I hardly think you would turn down the opportunity to clarify things.

Strange, don't you think so?

To add on, your critique now seems to be meandering all over the place. You started off with lambasting all the 1612 WLs without any substantiated FRs, moved on to a critique of the furnishing, and are now wondering why I posted in other threads. This does not align with your so called "mission" to investigate FRs, and is stark and clear testimony that your agenda is indeed personal and cannot be disguised at all.

Since you feel you have to be fair to bros here as you had stated in an earlier post, why not first address my points raised in my immediate past post to you before I reply to your questions? I believe I raised them first so I think itz only fair. That you chose to reply to my points with questions is quite puzzling.

Quite strange, don't you think so?

[Doomas]

I have actually answered your questions before much earlier. You simply needed to check back.

Think or say what you will but the fact still stands that the 1612 WLs you so vehemently denigrated continue to enjoy high RTFs and new clients. I think that's testimony enough to their quality. I'm afraid your credibility has been weighed instead and been found lacking with so many of the questions posed to you gone unanswered.

Probably will not address you further until you have new issues to raise. Till then, pls enjoy promoting yourself

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

The questions that I've posed have been posed to you several times before your latest post below.

However, you simply refuse to answer about you and cuntking's agenda in posting almost exclusively about 1612 inthe 1612 threads whenever you post anything about the legal geylang scene.

Instead, you're trying hard to distract others by going round in circles about all sorts of other things instead of getting to the point.

Whatever it is, my objective has been achieved in exposing you and cuntking's FRs as one-sidedly promoting the girls in just one house for years, so there's no need for me to belabour things any longer

Good day!

[BronzeGod]

Originally Posted by Doomas

I have actually answered your questions before much earlier. You simply needed to check back.

Think or say what you will but the fact still stands that the 1612 WLs you so vehemently denigrated continue to enjoy high RTFs and new clients. I think that's testimony enough to their quality. I'm afraid your credibility has been weighed instead and been found lacking with so many of the questions posed to you gone unanswered.

Probably will not address you further until you have new issues to raise. Till then, pls enjoy promoting yourself

Don't try to deflect the truth about your agenda by saying I'm promoting myself bro. Nice try

You and cuntking have been exlusively promoting yourselves and the girls in 1612 for three years or more, even coining brand names for them like "air geylang" for tong tong and "deepthroat secondary" for "wawa".

You even report how many bookings they had a day to obviously entice curious bros to go down by demostrating how in demand they are. If you had posted even half as frequently about other houses and girls, I'd be inclined to believe your frs.

But you and cuntking almost never post about anything else in the legal geylang scene for the past three years, apart from singing high praises of the girls in 1612 and churning out promotional FRs on the house with gusto.

Sorry, please don't lie to yourself and try to say that my credibility is hanging in the balance when yours has clearly been flushed down the drain.

And your desperate attempts along with cuntking since yesterday to start interacting in other legal scene threads to show you do post elsewhere can do nothing to salvage things when for YEARS you've stayed in your own caves in the 1612 threads.

You r like George Yeo and his team in Aljunied, after ignoring the ground for years and staying in your ivory towers, when people find out you're out of touch, you desperately hold event after event to show that you are "walking the ground".

Anyone here can see that by simply searching for posts by doomas and cuntking to see when was the last few times you two posted out of 1612 threads over the past few years.

[Doomas]

More is less, less is more. You can't supress the emerging facts with desperate rhetoric.

What a circus.

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

The questions that I've posed have been posed to you several times before your latest post below.

However, you simply refuse to answer about you and cuntking's agenda in posting almost exclusively about 1612 inthe 1612 threads whenever you post anything about the legal geylang scene.

Instead, you're trying hard to distract others by going round in circles about all sorts of other things instead of getting to the point.

Whatever it is, my objective has been achieved in exposing you and cuntking's FRs as one-sidedly promoting the girls in just one house for years, so there's no need for me to belabour things any longer

Good day!

Originally Posted by BronzeGod

Don't try to deflect the truth about your agenda by saying I'm promoting myself bro. Nice try

You and cuntking have been exlusively promoting yourselves and the girls in 1612 for three years or more, even coining brand names for them like "air geylang" for tong tong and "deepthroat secondary" for "wawa".

You even report how many bookings they had a day to obviously entice curious bros to go down by demostrating how in demand they are. If you had posted even half as frequently about other houses and girls, I'd be inclined to believe your frs.

But you and cuntking almost never post about anything else in the legal geylang scene for the past three years, apart from singing high praises of the girls in 1612 and churning out promotional FRs on the house with gusto.

Sorry, please don't lie to yourself and try to say that my credibility is hanging in the balance when yours has clearly been flushed down the drain.

And your desperate attempts along with cuntking since yesterday to start interacting in other legal scene threads to show you do post elsewhere can do nothing to salvage things when for YEARS you've stayed in your own caves in the 1612 threads.

You r like George Yeo and his team in Aljunied, after ignoring the ground for years and staying in your ivory towers, when people find out you're out of touch, you desperately hold event after event to show that you are "walking the ground".

Anyone here can see that by simply searching for posts by doomas and cuntking to see when was the last few times you two posted out of 1612 threads over the past few years.

[BronzeGod]

Originally Posted by Doomas

More is less, less is more. You can't supress the emerging facts with desperate rhetoric.

What a circus.

Desperate rhetoric? A circus?Please. The only people running a circus for several years are you and cuntking in your attempts to promote 1612 as a top class act thinking no one would notice or point out that you both almost never post about girls or houses beyond 1612 in geylang.

The two of you are like food reviewers that only exclusively write reviews about one restaurant for three over years while almost totally ignoring other outlets in your reports, and expect others to view your reviews as credible.

What a joke.