Sammyboy RSS Feed
07-03-2016, 10:20 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
I know someone who worked 41 years in SP. When the person reached 62, there was plain denial of re-hire despite having got to that position thru good performance and promotions. There was even a long service award by the Minister MOE. However the director of library is such a arsehole that a few years before reaching 62, she orchestrated a series of events to tar her performance appraisals such that a re-employment became difficult if not impossible!! Upon appeal to SP principal and MOM a re-employment contract for 2 years was reluctantly offered .... on condition that the incumbent met up with the director (library)!!! Though doing the same job at same position, pay was cut some 35%, leave reduced almost 80% and medical benefits shrunk considerably. The re-hire contract was shafted down the director's rear end.
So what was Amy Khor talking about when she said most took up the re-hire with no cut in pay ...(& presumbably benefits????). Clearly the re-hire policy as mooted by PSC and NTuc stinks and govt is now doing damage control and back paddling!!!!!!!! Why was there a need to drastically cut pay and perks after crossing the 62 years line????????????? Did't LKY worked till 91 without pay or perk cut???
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?226198-Victimization-Singapore-Polytechnic-Ref-Re-employment-Heap-of-Shit-in-the-Library&goto=newpost).
I know someone who worked 41 years in SP. When the person reached 62, there was plain denial of re-hire despite having got to that position thru good performance and promotions. There was even a long service award by the Minister MOE. However the director of library is such a arsehole that a few years before reaching 62, she orchestrated a series of events to tar her performance appraisals such that a re-employment became difficult if not impossible!! Upon appeal to SP principal and MOM a re-employment contract for 2 years was reluctantly offered .... on condition that the incumbent met up with the director (library)!!! Though doing the same job at same position, pay was cut some 35%, leave reduced almost 80% and medical benefits shrunk considerably. The re-hire contract was shafted down the director's rear end.
So what was Amy Khor talking about when she said most took up the re-hire with no cut in pay ...(& presumbably benefits????). Clearly the re-hire policy as mooted by PSC and NTuc stinks and govt is now doing damage control and back paddling!!!!!!!! Why was there a need to drastically cut pay and perks after crossing the 62 years line????????????? Did't LKY worked till 91 without pay or perk cut???
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?226198-Victimization-Singapore-Polytechnic-Ref-Re-employment-Heap-of-Shit-in-the-Library&goto=newpost).