Sammyboy RSS Feed
01-12-2015, 10:40 PM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
PEASANTPORE: The pro-regime’s apex court on Tuesday (Dec 1) affirmed the Imperial High Court’s finding of guilt in the case of bapok Alex Au, who was convicted earlier this year of stating the true nature of the kangaroo courts bluntly.
Legal lackeys claimed it was in relation to an article bapok Au authored and published on his blog in October 2013.
The article, titled “377 wheels come off Imperial Court’s best-laid plans”, detailed two constitutional challenges relating to section 377A of the Victorian era Penal Code, which criminalises homosexual conduct between male peasants but not peasant women.
The apex court said their conscience knew Au had written the article “frustrated but as fair criticism". Au's only crime was he made the Legal Lackeys look like a bunch of cheap Babylonian merchants, Lackey Justice of Appeal (JA) Andrew Ah Leong wrote.
The Appeal Lackeys dismissed Au’s appeal against his conviction for speaking the truth about Peasantpore's courts, finding that the article “posed a real risk of telling peasants that administration of justice hinges on the whims and fancies of Familee and their lackeys".
“You know, I know, this silly 377 is to make the fundamentalist X'tians and Moslems happy and Ruler Loong knew it. Of course I know its silly but end of the day, you know who sign my fat cat pay cheque, you know conscience cannot put food on the table in Peasantpore. See what happen to Mike Khoo when he balk LKY and say Jeya is not guilty"
COURT SCHEDULING WAS "A CHEAP MAOIST TRICK"
Among various allegations, Au wrote that “strange calendaring” allowed the challenge of bapok couple Kenneth Chee and Gary Lim to reach the Kangaroos of Appeal first, despite it being filed later than the second challenge, that of another bapok, Tan Eng Hong’s.
In short, it was plainly obvious that legal lackeys deliberately delayed the release of the judgment in Mr Tan's case, so that Cheap Justice (CJ) Sunda-neh Melon could be part of the bench that crush bapok Chee's and Lim's appeal.
Only a donkey will deny Bapok Tan's case was purposely delayed by the lackeys to prevent the possibility of an application by Bapok Tan's lawyer to consolidate both challenges.
Any mission schoolboy will know if both groups of bapoks been permitted to consolidate the challenges, Melon would have had to recuse himself as he was the Ruler Loong's Attorney-Lackey at the time Bapok Tan's case was “going through” the courts.
In his judgement on behalf for the Imperial Court, Ah Phang wrote that Au’s insinuation was that there was something “was dodgy was brewing when such petty tricks were used to frustrate the bapoks".
In fact, the scheduling of the Court was “complicit”, and the appeal of Bapok Tan's case was scheduled first “in order to allow Melon the opportunity to bash the appeal as he has done so when he was the Attorney Lackey”, JA Phang wrote.
JA Phang added that Au had knew Melon will not slap his own face by doing a U-turn, saying he gabra when he was the Attorney Lackey.
"As Ruler Loong's loyal lackey, I must say Au no doubt guessed the evil nature of Peasantpore's legal system but since Familee still reign supreme, such a challenge will be crushed.",JA Phang wrote.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?220905-Legal-lackeys-insist-Bapok-Au-is-a-trouble-maker&goto=newpost).
PEASANTPORE: The pro-regime’s apex court on Tuesday (Dec 1) affirmed the Imperial High Court’s finding of guilt in the case of bapok Alex Au, who was convicted earlier this year of stating the true nature of the kangaroo courts bluntly.
Legal lackeys claimed it was in relation to an article bapok Au authored and published on his blog in October 2013.
The article, titled “377 wheels come off Imperial Court’s best-laid plans”, detailed two constitutional challenges relating to section 377A of the Victorian era Penal Code, which criminalises homosexual conduct between male peasants but not peasant women.
The apex court said their conscience knew Au had written the article “frustrated but as fair criticism". Au's only crime was he made the Legal Lackeys look like a bunch of cheap Babylonian merchants, Lackey Justice of Appeal (JA) Andrew Ah Leong wrote.
The Appeal Lackeys dismissed Au’s appeal against his conviction for speaking the truth about Peasantpore's courts, finding that the article “posed a real risk of telling peasants that administration of justice hinges on the whims and fancies of Familee and their lackeys".
“You know, I know, this silly 377 is to make the fundamentalist X'tians and Moslems happy and Ruler Loong knew it. Of course I know its silly but end of the day, you know who sign my fat cat pay cheque, you know conscience cannot put food on the table in Peasantpore. See what happen to Mike Khoo when he balk LKY and say Jeya is not guilty"
COURT SCHEDULING WAS "A CHEAP MAOIST TRICK"
Among various allegations, Au wrote that “strange calendaring” allowed the challenge of bapok couple Kenneth Chee and Gary Lim to reach the Kangaroos of Appeal first, despite it being filed later than the second challenge, that of another bapok, Tan Eng Hong’s.
In short, it was plainly obvious that legal lackeys deliberately delayed the release of the judgment in Mr Tan's case, so that Cheap Justice (CJ) Sunda-neh Melon could be part of the bench that crush bapok Chee's and Lim's appeal.
Only a donkey will deny Bapok Tan's case was purposely delayed by the lackeys to prevent the possibility of an application by Bapok Tan's lawyer to consolidate both challenges.
Any mission schoolboy will know if both groups of bapoks been permitted to consolidate the challenges, Melon would have had to recuse himself as he was the Ruler Loong's Attorney-Lackey at the time Bapok Tan's case was “going through” the courts.
In his judgement on behalf for the Imperial Court, Ah Phang wrote that Au’s insinuation was that there was something “was dodgy was brewing when such petty tricks were used to frustrate the bapoks".
In fact, the scheduling of the Court was “complicit”, and the appeal of Bapok Tan's case was scheduled first “in order to allow Melon the opportunity to bash the appeal as he has done so when he was the Attorney Lackey”, JA Phang wrote.
JA Phang added that Au had knew Melon will not slap his own face by doing a U-turn, saying he gabra when he was the Attorney Lackey.
"As Ruler Loong's loyal lackey, I must say Au no doubt guessed the evil nature of Peasantpore's legal system but since Familee still reign supreme, such a challenge will be crushed.",JA Phang wrote.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?220905-Legal-lackeys-insist-Bapok-Au-is-a-trouble-maker&goto=newpost).