Sammyboy RSS Feed
18-06-2015, 04:50 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2...stly/28863541/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/06/17/uber-drivers-employees-ruling-costly/28863541/)
California ruling challenges Uber business model
Kaja Whitehouse, USAToday
7 minutes ago
Facebook
Twitter
Google Plus
more
Andrew Gombert, EPA
Travis Kalanick, CEO and co-founder of Uber, in July 2012.
NEW YORK — In a ruling that could significantly raise costs for ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft, the California Labor Commission ruled this week that a driver who filed a complaint against Uber Technologies was an employee, not an independent contractor.
The driver, Barbara Berwick, was awarded a mere $4,152 — chump change for Uber. But the technology giant is appealing the ruling because it could significantly increase the $40 billion start-up company's costs.
Uber currently saddles its drivers with major vehicle costs — including the vehicle itself, maintenance, insurance and gas — by labeling its drivers independent contractors rather than employees. If Uber is forced to treat drivers as employees, it could bear a greater share of those costs, as well as Social Security, workers compensation and other benefits, experts said.
Since it was founded in 2009, Uber has held its drivers at arms length by claiming it merely provides the technology to match them with riders. But the California Labor Commission said Uber maintains a good deal of control over its drivers, which makes it more of an employer than "a neutral technological platform, designed simply to enable drivers and passengers to transact the business of transportation."
Uber "is involved in every aspect of the operation," including the fares drivers charge, the model of cars they drive and, to some extent, how often they work, the commission said. Drivers also cannot negotiate the portion of the fares they collect and share with Uber, the commission said.
"In light of the above, Plaintiff was Defendants' employee," the commission ruled.
"This ruling out of California causes the financial engine behind Uber to break down because this will definitely drive up costs," said Hayley Dryer, a labor employment attorney with Cullen and Dykman.
The ruling, if it sticks, could also impact other ride-hailing companies like Lyft, Dryer said.
The San Francisco start-up is appealing the ruling, according to documents filed with California state court in San Francisco, where the appeal will take place.
The ruling "is non-binding and applies to a single driver," Uber said in an emailed statement. The company also said the ruling contradicts a previous ruling by the same commission, which concluded in 2012 that the driver "performed services as an independent contractor, and not as a bona fide employee."
Berwick, who ran for local office in San Francisco in 2010 and has described herself as "a community activist," worked for Uber from July to September of last year. She argued for extra compensation for her stint, including reimbursement for certain costs.
The commission denied Berwick's claim for extra wages, but granted her claim for reimbursable expenses, including $3,622 for the 6,486 miles she drove on behalf of Uber, as well as $256 in toll charges.
Berwick was also granted $274 in interest. She did not immediately return a request for comment.
Both Silicon Valley and Wall Street have been throwing money at Uber and Lyft in hopes of cashing in if the companies file to sell their stock to the public. Uber, headed by CEO Travis Kalanick, has attracted money from mutual fund companies Fidelity Investments and Wellington Management in rounds that now value the company at more than $40 billion.
Lyft recently attracted a $100 million investment from billionaire Carl Icahn, who is supporting the smaller ride-hailing company alongside hedge fund manager Dan Loeb and tech giant Alibaba.
Uber has clashed with its drivers before, including protests over rate cuts to compete with Lyft and more traditional taxi companies. Protesting drivers argued that the cuts unfairly dented their earnings without alleviating their costs.
Labor unions have also protested the company's hands-off approach to its drivers. In March, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, United Nations under-secretary-general and executive director of UN Women, said no to collaborating with the ride-hailing company to create jobs for women drivers in part due to protests from labor unions.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?208854-US-court-ruled-against-Uber-this-screwed-Uber-up&goto=newpost).
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2...stly/28863541/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/06/17/uber-drivers-employees-ruling-costly/28863541/)
California ruling challenges Uber business model
Kaja Whitehouse, USAToday
7 minutes ago
Google Plus
more
Andrew Gombert, EPA
Travis Kalanick, CEO and co-founder of Uber, in July 2012.
NEW YORK — In a ruling that could significantly raise costs for ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft, the California Labor Commission ruled this week that a driver who filed a complaint against Uber Technologies was an employee, not an independent contractor.
The driver, Barbara Berwick, was awarded a mere $4,152 — chump change for Uber. But the technology giant is appealing the ruling because it could significantly increase the $40 billion start-up company's costs.
Uber currently saddles its drivers with major vehicle costs — including the vehicle itself, maintenance, insurance and gas — by labeling its drivers independent contractors rather than employees. If Uber is forced to treat drivers as employees, it could bear a greater share of those costs, as well as Social Security, workers compensation and other benefits, experts said.
Since it was founded in 2009, Uber has held its drivers at arms length by claiming it merely provides the technology to match them with riders. But the California Labor Commission said Uber maintains a good deal of control over its drivers, which makes it more of an employer than "a neutral technological platform, designed simply to enable drivers and passengers to transact the business of transportation."
Uber "is involved in every aspect of the operation," including the fares drivers charge, the model of cars they drive and, to some extent, how often they work, the commission said. Drivers also cannot negotiate the portion of the fares they collect and share with Uber, the commission said.
"In light of the above, Plaintiff was Defendants' employee," the commission ruled.
"This ruling out of California causes the financial engine behind Uber to break down because this will definitely drive up costs," said Hayley Dryer, a labor employment attorney with Cullen and Dykman.
The ruling, if it sticks, could also impact other ride-hailing companies like Lyft, Dryer said.
The San Francisco start-up is appealing the ruling, according to documents filed with California state court in San Francisco, where the appeal will take place.
The ruling "is non-binding and applies to a single driver," Uber said in an emailed statement. The company also said the ruling contradicts a previous ruling by the same commission, which concluded in 2012 that the driver "performed services as an independent contractor, and not as a bona fide employee."
Berwick, who ran for local office in San Francisco in 2010 and has described herself as "a community activist," worked for Uber from July to September of last year. She argued for extra compensation for her stint, including reimbursement for certain costs.
The commission denied Berwick's claim for extra wages, but granted her claim for reimbursable expenses, including $3,622 for the 6,486 miles she drove on behalf of Uber, as well as $256 in toll charges.
Berwick was also granted $274 in interest. She did not immediately return a request for comment.
Both Silicon Valley and Wall Street have been throwing money at Uber and Lyft in hopes of cashing in if the companies file to sell their stock to the public. Uber, headed by CEO Travis Kalanick, has attracted money from mutual fund companies Fidelity Investments and Wellington Management in rounds that now value the company at more than $40 billion.
Lyft recently attracted a $100 million investment from billionaire Carl Icahn, who is supporting the smaller ride-hailing company alongside hedge fund manager Dan Loeb and tech giant Alibaba.
Uber has clashed with its drivers before, including protests over rate cuts to compete with Lyft and more traditional taxi companies. Protesting drivers argued that the cuts unfairly dented their earnings without alleviating their costs.
Labor unions have also protested the company's hands-off approach to its drivers. In March, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, United Nations under-secretary-general and executive director of UN Women, said no to collaborating with the ride-hailing company to create jobs for women drivers in part due to protests from labor unions.
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?208854-US-court-ruled-against-Uber-this-screwed-Uber-up&goto=newpost).