Sammyboy RSS Feed
15-07-2014, 04:00 AM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
PRS IN SINGAPORE WON'T SERVE NS EVEN IF THEY ARE BANNED FROM RETURNING TO SG
.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;} Post date:
14 Jul 2014 - 2:36pm
http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/field/image/Nsf-sphe_0_0.jpg?itok=vI31c9IM (http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/field/image/Nsf-sphe_0_0.jpg)
Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen revealed in Parliament last week that over the past five years, about 7,200 second-generation permanent residents (PRs) who were liable for national service fulfilled their obligations, while about 2,600 of such eligible PRs renounced their PR status, prior to serving NS (“PRs who fulfilled NS obligations”; last Tuesday).
In recent years, there has been much angst towards second-generation PRs who choose not to bear their national service responsibility after benefiting from our system.
These PRs who renounced their PR status prior to serving NS already planned never to come back to Singapore to study or work, since they are aware they “will face serious adverse consequences when they subsequently apply to study or work in Singapore”, as stated by the Defence Ministry.
This shows that the current penalties are not severe enough to serve as a deterrent to these people, as we still see a number of such cases annually.
For male citizens above 16.5 years of age who have not enlisted for NS, their parents need to furnish a bond in the form of a banker’s guarantee of $75,000, or 50 per cent of the combined annual gross income of both parents for the preceding year, if their son remains overseas for a period.
If that is the case, shouldn’t the Government impose similar measures for the parents of male PRs as well? As a matter of fairness and for our country’s security, the Government must review the existing policies to make the parents of male PRs liable if their sons do not fulfil their NS obligations.
Lee Yong Se
* Letter appeared in ST Forum (14 Jul)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?185776-After-Getting-Free-Scholarships-PRS-IN-SINGAPORE-WON-T-SERVE-NS-EVEN-IF-THEY-ARE-BAN&goto=newpost).
PRS IN SINGAPORE WON'T SERVE NS EVEN IF THEY ARE BANNED FROM RETURNING TO SG
.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;} Post date:
14 Jul 2014 - 2:36pm
http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/field/image/Nsf-sphe_0_0.jpg?itok=vI31c9IM (http://therealsingapore.com/sites/default/files/field/image/Nsf-sphe_0_0.jpg)
Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen revealed in Parliament last week that over the past five years, about 7,200 second-generation permanent residents (PRs) who were liable for national service fulfilled their obligations, while about 2,600 of such eligible PRs renounced their PR status, prior to serving NS (“PRs who fulfilled NS obligations”; last Tuesday).
In recent years, there has been much angst towards second-generation PRs who choose not to bear their national service responsibility after benefiting from our system.
These PRs who renounced their PR status prior to serving NS already planned never to come back to Singapore to study or work, since they are aware they “will face serious adverse consequences when they subsequently apply to study or work in Singapore”, as stated by the Defence Ministry.
This shows that the current penalties are not severe enough to serve as a deterrent to these people, as we still see a number of such cases annually.
For male citizens above 16.5 years of age who have not enlisted for NS, their parents need to furnish a bond in the form of a banker’s guarantee of $75,000, or 50 per cent of the combined annual gross income of both parents for the preceding year, if their son remains overseas for a period.
If that is the case, shouldn’t the Government impose similar measures for the parents of male PRs as well? As a matter of fairness and for our country’s security, the Government must review the existing policies to make the parents of male PRs liable if their sons do not fulfil their NS obligations.
Lee Yong Se
* Letter appeared in ST Forum (14 Jul)
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://www.singsupplies.com/showthread.php?185776-After-Getting-Free-Scholarships-PRS-IN-SINGAPORE-WON-T-SERVE-NS-EVEN-IF-THEY-ARE-BAN&goto=newpost).