Sammyboy RSS Feed
15-08-2013, 03:40 PM
An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:
This maybe something interesting to assess Singapore 50 years of education system since 1959 under PAP.
PAP type of education system did not produce talent but more or less produced NSF army boys 'keng king' type achievers. That probably have to do with their stagnant and 'chai chai' style of education system where you can beat their system to bag as many 'As' distinction as you like.
Under PAP style of ruling the country which systematically engineered to produce kiasu and kiasi people, correct? If you work back on their past 10 years series question papers you can notice how MOE kiasu kiasi examiners set their question papers. They will set say 6 compulsory questions out of the 10 questions, for example. These 6 pao jia questions are worded differently that's all, change pattern only. So just rote learning whack what you remembered and you are sure to pocket 'Credit' grade for that subject.
Then you worked on these kiasu kiasi kings and queens mentality to trace back their stagnant style of setting question papers using their past 10 years series question papers. These other 4 questions follow a set of pattern which you can easily smoked them out. Such as question(s) came out last year would not likely to come out again this year, and/or questions that came out 3-4 years ago are more likely to come out this year. Their pattern very standard type one, pa si buay chao. You can easily zoom in on the probabilities which questions are likely to come back this year then rote learning on that subjects well. Since you already bagged at least 'credit' grade from the 6 compulsory questions it is just a matter of scoring higher grade, 'B' or 'A", that's all and nothing to lose, right?
So to speak Singapore where got produce talents? To say no is also not correct, agree?
Yes it has, it produced a lot of NSF army boys 'keng king' type achievers taking advantage of the daft PAP stagnant education system to do well in school?
No need study so hard, keng can do.
50 years later now you know why they need FTs here, foreign got talent. With daft LKY stagnant style of education system can only produce keng king people, not really daft people. What do you think?
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?159922-SIngapore-education-system&goto=newpost).
This maybe something interesting to assess Singapore 50 years of education system since 1959 under PAP.
PAP type of education system did not produce talent but more or less produced NSF army boys 'keng king' type achievers. That probably have to do with their stagnant and 'chai chai' style of education system where you can beat their system to bag as many 'As' distinction as you like.
Under PAP style of ruling the country which systematically engineered to produce kiasu and kiasi people, correct? If you work back on their past 10 years series question papers you can notice how MOE kiasu kiasi examiners set their question papers. They will set say 6 compulsory questions out of the 10 questions, for example. These 6 pao jia questions are worded differently that's all, change pattern only. So just rote learning whack what you remembered and you are sure to pocket 'Credit' grade for that subject.
Then you worked on these kiasu kiasi kings and queens mentality to trace back their stagnant style of setting question papers using their past 10 years series question papers. These other 4 questions follow a set of pattern which you can easily smoked them out. Such as question(s) came out last year would not likely to come out again this year, and/or questions that came out 3-4 years ago are more likely to come out this year. Their pattern very standard type one, pa si buay chao. You can easily zoom in on the probabilities which questions are likely to come back this year then rote learning on that subjects well. Since you already bagged at least 'credit' grade from the 6 compulsory questions it is just a matter of scoring higher grade, 'B' or 'A", that's all and nothing to lose, right?
So to speak Singapore where got produce talents? To say no is also not correct, agree?
Yes it has, it produced a lot of NSF army boys 'keng king' type achievers taking advantage of the daft PAP stagnant education system to do well in school?
No need study so hard, keng can do.
50 years later now you know why they need FTs here, foreign got talent. With daft LKY stagnant style of education system can only produce keng king people, not really daft people. What do you think?
Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com (http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?159922-SIngapore-education-system&goto=newpost).